Skip to main content

Bangladeshi American Muslim Hasib Golamrabbi Found Guilty for Double Murder of Parents


















Hasib Golamrabbi (far right) was found guilty Oct. 25 of murdering his parents, Golam Rabbi and Shamina Begum Golamrabbi (center), in 2016. During the trial, Hasib Golamrabbi, who represented himself, frequently tried to blame his younger brother Omar (left) for the slayings, characterizing him as a psychopath




 Capping a bizarre case where a San Jose man on trial for murdering his parents represented himself, a jury found the defendant guilty on Thursday, rejecting his strategy of blaming his younger brother for the slayings at their Evergreen home.


Hasib bin Golamrabbi showed no emotion when the court clerk read aloud the verdicts in a Hall of Justice courtroom Thursday morning, and as the ethnically diverse jury of nine men and three women affirmed their belief that Golamrabbi committed two murders with enhancements for using a firearm and lying in wait when he fatally shot Golam Rabbi, 59, and Shamima Rabbi, 57 the morning of April 23, 2016.
Golamrabbi, clad in a charcoal-colored suit, initially said “Not at the moment” when asked by Judge Vanessa Zecher if he had anything to say after the verdicts were read. But after the jury left the courtroom, he asked procedural questions about what will happen at the Nov. 16 sentencing hearing, including prodding about how he might get the jury’s verdict set aside.

Zecher told Golamrabbi that such a question could be raised at sentencing. Golamrabbi faces a maximum sentence of life in prison without parole.
Jurors declined to comment on the verdict as they filed out of Zecher’s courtroom, and no family members of the Rabbis were present in court Thursday. San Jose police Sgt. Ken Tran, one of the lead detectives in the case, attended much of the trial but deferred comment to prosecutors.
Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Alaleh Kianerci, speaking on behalf of Carlos Vega — who prosecuted the nearly month-long trial but was not available for the verdict reading — thanked the jury for their “careful consideration” of complex testimony while keeping the trauma to the Rabbi family in focus.
“We’re satisfied that justice has been done in this case,” Kianerci said. “But a couple is dead, one son was orphaned, and another was convicted of killing them. There are no winners here.”
Kianerci also said about the Rabbis: “They were a lovely couple who was very well regarded in the community. It truly is a tragedy.”
Golamrabbi, 24, spent much of his defense trying to blame the killings on his younger brother Omar, who was 17 at the time, as a sociopathic mastermind who compelled the defendant into taking the fall for him.
According to San Jose police detectives, Golamrabbi shot his father repeatedly in the garage of their Lucas Court home and then killed his mother with a single shot to the back of the head. Golamrabbi then drove with Omar to Oakland to attend the Kraken Con anime convention, and returned to San Jose the next morning. He left Omar in the Evergreen area before driving away.
Golamrabbi was arrested by police a few days later in Tracy at the home of his friend Matthew Kuch, who testified during the trial that Golamrabbi confessed to the murders to him, and initially said he was coerced by an unnamed past abuser and serial home intruder. Kuch also said that Golamrabbi hatched a plot to record a social-media video where Kuch would impersonate an assailant and simulate beating him, to add credence to his intruder account.
The defendant’s brother Omar testified that he was in the bathroom when he heard Hasib and his father arguing in the garage over a recurring conflict about his education and employment and the rules of the house.
“I heard my dad ask ‘What did you do?’ and he shot him continuously,” Omar testified about his brother.
Omar said he then heard his mother try to intervene and Hasib telling her to hide, then moments later, shooting her in the head with their father’s hunting rifle. The brother was initially arrested in connection with the killings but later dropped from the case for lack of evidence.

Golamrabbi alleged Omar committed the killings and that the entire plot, including telling police that an intruder coerced him, was the brainchild of his younger sibling, who he characterized as disaffected, spoiled, and disillusioned enough with their parents to have an equal or stronger motive to kill them.
The defendant testified that he took the blame for the killings to fulfill a promise to his late mother to protect his kid brother.
Hints of motives for the killings have bubbled up since the Rabbis died, including their disdain for Golamrabbi’s passion for cosplay — the hobby of dressing up as a character from a movie, book, cartoon or video game — perceive favoritism of Omar, and potential conflict over his sexuality. But no definitive motive was established by police or at trial.


“We may never know the true motive,” Kianerci said Thursday.
Golamrabbi offered a narrative of events that while asserting his innocence, often failed to track logically and exhibited lapses in memory for previous witnesses’ testimony — including his own.
Vega also noted that the prosecution didn’t know about Golamrabbi’s defense theory until shortly before the trial.


The defendant also did not have a convincing explanation for a jailhouse letter he is said to have sent to Omar that appears to instruct him and Kuch not to cooperate with the prosecution, saying only that he did not believe the letter was authentic.
He testified that on the morning after the murder, he followed his younger brother’s “suggestions,” and  wrote cryptic messages throughout the house to convince investigators that an intruder committed the killings.
Vega also questioned the defendant about why he staged a crime scene when he could have directly presented the intruder theory to police or family members.
“Criminal activity is not my expertise,” Golamrabbi responded. “Whatever I did, there was no logic behind it.”







Following a nearly month-long trial, a jury at the Santa Clara County, Calif., Hall of Justice found Oct. 25 that 24-year-old Hasib bin Golamrabbi was guilty of the 2016 murder of his parents at their home in the Evergreen district of San Jose.
Golamrabbi will be sentenced Nov. 16. He faces a life sentence without the possibility of parole.
Since his arrest on April 28, 2016, he has been held without bail at the Santa Clara county jail. The Mercury News reported that Golamrabbi showed no emotion as the verdict was read out.
Golamrabbi represented himself during the trial, and attempted to blame his younger brother Omar, 17, for the slaying of his parents. After his arrest in 2016, Golamrabbi also told police that strangers had come into his home and forced him to kill his parents.
Hasib killed his parents April 23 and then fled the scene with Omar to attend an anime cartoon convention. The dead couple were found by relatives who had been trying to reach them for several days.
Both Omar and Hasib were arrested after their parents were found. Omar told police that his brother had told him to go back to the garage – where the bodies were found – to ensure that blood was not seeping out. Omar was held at juvenile hall; the charges against him were later dropped when prosecutors found they had insufficient evidence to charge him, and that he was most likely just a witness to the gruesome scene. He was then released to Child Protective Services.
During the trial, Hasib Golamrabbi characterized his brother as a psychopath and said that he was responsible for the deaths of their parents. Hasib told jurors that Omar had coerced him into confessing, though Omar had actually done the slayings.
Initial evidence noted that Hasib had a history of mental illness. After his arrest, a family friend, Mahmood Ghani, told that Hasib was noticeably anti-social and largely on the sidelines at social gatherings. Ghani noted that the deceased Golam Rabbi was fond of hunting and kept guns at home.
After the verdict was read out, Golamrabbi, clad in a charcoal-colored suit, initially said “Not at the moment” when asked by Judge Vanessa Zecher if he had anything to say after the verdicts were read, as reported by The Mercury News.
But after the jury left the courtroom, he asked procedural questions about what will happen at the Nov. 16 sentencing hearing, including prodding about how he might get the jury’s verdict set aside.
Santa Clara County Deputy District Attorney Alaleh Kianerci said after the verdict was read out: “We’re satisfied that justice has been done in this case. But a couple is dead, one son was orphaned, and another was convicted of killing them. There are no winners here.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

India the most dangerous country to be a woman, US ranks 10th in survey

India the most dangerous country to be a woman, US ranks 10th in survey India the most dangerous country to be a woman, US ranks 10th in survey By  Angela Dewan , CNN Updated 6:51 AM ET, Tue June 26, 2018 Play Video M. Hasna Maznavi: She built a mosque for women 'I'm beautiful, but I'm dangerous' The impact of Clinton's feminism in China Audi ad likens women to used cars in China Women on what feminism is ... and isn't What's a 'menstruation hut'? Saudi music video on women's rights goes viral Women's rights activists in Russia protest law India: Women, class, and discrimination Why does the gender wage gap still exist? The...

Bharatkumar Patel, aka Bharat Patel, 43, an Indian national who had resided in Midlothian, Illinois, and others from AHMEDABAD, Gujarat, AND MUMBAI, India, pleaded guilty before U.S. District Court Judge David Hittner of the Southern District of Texas for multi million dollars IRS TAX call center fraud.

According to admissions made in connection with the plea, Patel and his co-conspirators perpetrated a complex scheme in which individuals from call centers located in Ahmedabad, India, impersonated officials from the IRS or U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services in a ruse designed to defraud victims located throughout the United States. Using information obtained from data brokers and other sources, call center operators targeted U.S. victims who were threatened with arrest, imprisonment, fines or deportation if they did not pay alleged monies owed to the government. Victims who agreed to pay the scammers were instructed how to provide payment, including by purchasing stored value cards or wiring money, and upon payment, the call centers would immediately turn to a network of “runners” based in the U.S. to liquidate and launder the fraudulently-obtained funds. According to his plea, beginning in or about July 2013, Patel worked as a member of a crew of runners operati...

Parimal Mehta, an Indian-American owner and CEO of an IT firm in Detroit has been indicted to bribe a city officials to receive work under MBE/Minority Owned Business Enterprise city contracts

Parimal Mehta, an Indian-American owner and CEO of an IT firm in Detroit has been indicted to bribe a city officials to receive work under MBE/Minority Owned Business Enterprise city contracts. An Indian-American owner and CEO of an IT firm in Detroit has been indicted for his alleged role in orchestrating a scheme to bribe a city official to obtain benefits for his company, the Justice Department said. Parimal D. Mehta, 54, of Northville, Michigan, was charged in a 11-count indictment with five counts of honest services mail and wire fraud, one count of federal programme bribery and five counts of unlawfully using interstate facilities to commit bribery, said Acting Assistant Attorney General John P. Cronan on Wednesday. Between 2009 to August 2016, Mehta made multiple cash payments to Charles L. Dodd, the former Director of Detroit's Office of Departmental Technology Services, according to the indictment. This included two cash bribes hand-d...